THIS is why men need 21 orgasms a month

We chemical engineers are trained to provide a purge stream in our process designs for each possible contaminant, known or unknown, lest one or more accumulate therein. I have seen other studies over the years similar to this one and they make sense, particularly in light of the association of prostate cancer with the presence of certain metals, such as zinc, at elevated levels.

My father died prematurely of prostate cancer — it was horrible. Ever since, I’ve masturbated frequently for this very reason. My counter here instead deals with my particular addiction.

YMMV. Make your own choices.

 

Idk man… only 19% decrease in risk, plus you get all the negative things from ejaculation…

21 orgasms a month would destroy my health and energy

 

Dot belive in studyes you don't know how that studyes where preformed.
Everybody who ever got prostate cancer where allready mastrubating. Do you know anybody that got prostate cancer and never mastrubate in his life?

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5040619/

 

wow...what an incredible findings.So do these studies confirm that indeed run a chance of developing prostate cancer if we keep marturbating? I read some conclusions that were not the case.

 

..and your opinion on these findings??Should we masturbate more to keep from having prostate cancer or whatt?

 

Masturbation: "From the Latin words manstuprare, from manus "hand" (as in manual) + stuprare "defile" (oneself), from stuprum "defilement, dishonor," related to stupere "to be stunned, stupefied" (as in stupid)."

Ejaculation: “Devolution: the transfer or delegation of power to a lower level; the descent to a lower state. Pass into (a different state, especially a worse one); degenerate.”

 

..no answer........give it......

 

Still in that study there is no proof.

 

The answer is 100% clear. Any more orders, my lord?

 

Ugh.. again with this 'prostate cancer' bullshit? Really? -__-

 

Winner! If this is true, I've beat the 21 orgasms/month by over 500 times in my lifetime average!

 

Please see these post which debunk some of the prostate myths: https://forum.nofap.com/index.php?t...e-a-healthy-habbit.346548/page-3#post-3749491

21 ejaculations a month. I probably only did that during my honeymoon. Let's face it most men who are at risk of prostate cancer are 60+. I guarantee you (I'm 55), there are no men in that age range ejaculating's that much, except for porn addicts. It's really ridiculous. Also prostrate cancer is one of the most treatable and detectible cancers out there. My dad's in is 80s, had stage 4, but just went through radiation and is fine. If you are at risk, get checked annually and stop fapping. The health benefits of not fapping will far outweigh any risk.

This is a good Huberman post on Cancer and Prostrate cancer (obesity is the leading cause indicator):
What I've heard from multiple experts is that Sugar/carbs feeds cancer cells, while if your body goes into ketosis, then your body will naturally feed on and destroy the cancer cells. This will also reduce inflammation, which should help with an enlarged prostrate. Whereas, masturbation makes you lazy, undisciplined, sleep deprived, and prone to over indulge in other addictions like food. You decide what is the greater risk.

 

The same "scientists" who claim that you need to ejaculate a completely arbitrary amount are the same people who want you to believe that eating bugs is as good for you as steak and that by paying more taxes we can stop global warming. They are propagandists.

 

...good analogy

 

It's staggering what people will latch onto to justify their compulsive jerking habit.

 

100%. Anything to keep the male population weak, low-T, and dependent.

 

Ok. Maybe ejaculation is good for you, maybe it has no effect. I’m not for or against it either way. Explicit material is the problem. I doubt many people here have a problem with simply masturbating with their eyes closed too much so I don’t find this particularly insightful.