1. Welcome to NoFap! We have disabled new forum accounts from being registered for the time being. In the meantime, you can join our weekly accountability groups.
    Dismiss Notice

Anyone else struggle with PMO but without feelings of attraction?

For Fapstronauts who are disciples of Christ

  1. Faithe

    Faithe Fapstronaut

    128
    440
    63
    Perhaps an odd thing to bring up, I don't know... but I've noticed that when it comes to being tempted, I have found I wrestle more with fantasies and sexual scenarios rather than my attraction to any individual.

    There's a lot of discussion here about wrestling with being tempted by beautiful women or what they are wearing, but I've never found that to be the case for me when it comes to attractive men (or even women for that matter, since I think I have a bit of same-sex attraction due to porn). I find myself more drawn to the "story" or scenario of a pornographic fantasy with little to no regard of anyone's appearances or gender. It seems that as long as its sexual, I'm on board and I don't seem to care who is or isn't pretty. Finding someone attractive doesn't send me straight to lust for whatever reason.

    I find it difficult to relate to people when they discuss being thrown off guard by seeing an attractive person. It has to be a pornographic or fantasy scenario only. I'm just curious if others feel the same...? Has PMO made me dull to these things?
     
    Wilderness Wanderer likes this.
  2. I think it is worth considering different frameworks of attraction. This is obviously a generalization, and everyone is different, but it seems to me that men tend to be predominantly visually stimulated, whereas women are more stimulated by by the ability of a man to provide or protect (e.g., through financial wherewithal, status in a community, or strength of character/charisma or body/muscle). Men go for images (porn), women go for story (romance novels). Again, I'm not saying this is 100% the case, and there is of course overlap, but this may explain what you bring up here in your post. I think these two different emphases are somewhat God-ordained and biological, though, again, not absolute.
     
    Mara43, SwedishViking and Faithe like this.
  3. There's no accounting for taste. At the end of the day, does it matter? Lust is the desire to control and/or possess something that is not ours, to share in a simulacrum of intimacy in a context that cannot possibly provide it. Whatever we lust after - youth, beauty, illicitness, connection - we will never find it in P or MO. Of that we can be sure.
     
  4. Faithe

    Faithe Fapstronaut

    128
    440
    63
    I wondered that; it's possible. A generalization for sure, and there's more overlap than not, but it is definitely based in reality. It's a mix of biology and how the different sexes are raised and how they are taught to think about the opposite sex.
     
    Wilderness Wanderer likes this.
  5. Faithe

    Faithe Fapstronaut

    128
    440
    63
    That's very true, lust is lust. I guess it makes little difference. I was just curious because I'm uncertain of what is normal to feel since I've wrestled with this even as a child. The line is blurry as to where my development has been affected. Sometimes I don't know what kinds of "tastes" are unhealthy or unusual. I don't want to have relationship or attachment issues I'm unaware of, for instance.

    Either way, whatever it is I'm navigating isn't helped by PMO. I suppose God will keep healing me and showing me where things have gone off track.
     
    Mara43 and Wilderness Wanderer like this.
  6. I hope what I say in this post is sufficiently related. I think it is, because it speaks of different desires--whether it be that between the desires of men and women, or different desires that individuals have, or different desires we develop over time and through the twisting deceit of porn.

    I read something in the last week or two that made a connection that was really rather profound. I don't know why I'd never seen or heard of this connection before, but when I read it it really convicted me. (Disclaimer: the Bible is an intensely literary book, with very subtle but intentional connections all over the place, a sign, I think, that proves its inspiration by God.)

    Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground the LORD God made to spring up every tree that is pleasant ["desirable"] to the sight and good for food. The tree of life was in the midst of the garden, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

    Genesis 3:6 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate.

    Exodus 20:17 "You shall not covet your neighbor's house; you shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his male servant, or his female servant, or his ox, or his donkey, or anything that is your neighbor's."

    Each of the words above that are bold-italic are actually the same word in Hebrew. I think I've always missed this connection because I assumed the verbs "desire" and "covet" were different Hebrew words, but that's not the case. Incidentally, this Hebrew word only occurs in those two places in Genesis, and Exodus 20:17 is the first occurrence of the word in the book of Exodus.

    Just think of what this means:
    1. God placed in the garden of Eden for Adam and Eve desirable things for food.
    2. Through the lie of the serpent, Eve was tempted to the illicit desire of wisdom by eating God-forbidden fruit.
    3. In the Tenth Commandment, we are told not to desire anything belonging to our neighbor.

    In short, by our desires--whether that be the beauty of a woman not our wife, or a romantic story or situation we play in our head--we routinely repeat the primordial sin of the Fall of our first parents in the garden. Rather than the Tenth Commandment being anything like an add-on, catch-all, or after-thought, it actually warns against that which is at the core of our rebellion: illicit and misplaced desire.
     
  7. Faithe

    Faithe Fapstronaut

    128
    440
    63
    Thank you for sharing, this is very insightful.
    It all boils down to our sinful and/or misplaced desires. It seems that from the Genesis account of God making desirable trees that it is not wrong to find something desirable or to have desire, but we can have the wrong kinds of desire that make it wrong.

    It keeps being said on these forums that PMO boils down to an incorrect attempt to meet an innate desire that can only be properly met in a godly way. It's so simple, but so difficult to learn and adopt in everyday life. It's a cross to carry every day.
     
    Wilderness Wanderer likes this.
  8. So we function differently, perhaps because of our genders, and maybe pmo has something to do with it. But how are you then thrown off guard if it is not visual? By your own imagination? I think this could be important because for guys like me, we have to for example develop the reflex of instantly looking away if we accidentally look at a woman's chest or butt. But for you, if it is not visual, then what would that look like?
     
  9. Faithe

    Faithe Fapstronaut

    128
    440
    63
    I think it really involves changing my thoughts for me. Although porn introduced me to PMO as a kid and pretty much ruined me since, I actually don't struggle with literally looking at porn for the most part. It's pretty rare I will look anything up and seek visual stimulation (although it has happened, so I can't say I'm completely non-visual). I still use the full term PMO in my journal and posts because I find it more helpful and all-encompassing.
    I think my addiction is more deeply rooted in unmet emotional needs and negative relationship experiences from the past, with most of my fantasies making me out to be someone who is sexually desirable to someone else, and therefore my need is "met" by finally being "wanted" and "loved" in my fantasies. I don't spend much time building a profile for the fantasy person. Sometimes male, sometimes female, one person, many people, often with no specific appearance in mind. It's just the idea of being wanted and pursued sexually. Of course I know that sex doesn't necessarily equal love but my brain is still unlearning that. My inability to dissociate sexual pleasure and physical touch with emotional fulfillment and love is my main hangup. I think that's what I've been learning about myself recently.

    It's not that visual appeal doesn't play a role in who I'm attracted to, it's just that it's not what winds up in my fantasies whatsoever. It's like listening to an audiobook but not thinking about what the cover of the book looks like. I don't know. :confused:
     
  10. Your situation is complex and I will not pretend that I can relate to all of it. But I can relate to the sentence I quoted. I have had some time deep in the addiction, and I have had some time free in the past. And what I can say is that, deep in the addiction my brain sexualized everything, it's main focus was deriving sexual pleasure out of people. However, I have also been free for some extended periods of time in the past, and something that happens during freedom for me, is that I start to feel a love for people. So my pmo brain makes sex it's chief end, but during recovery, that starts to fade and emotions like love and fulfilment start to work properly again. I hope that gives you some motivation for your journey. If my brain can heal, I am sure yours can!
     
  11. Faithe

    Faithe Fapstronaut

    128
    440
    63
    I relate to sexualizing everything and it makes me feel awful when it happens. The further I get into every steak, things get better. I know the compassion and pure love I am capable of, not the desperate perversion that this addiction tries to instill in me. Thank you for the encouragement. May we all continue to heal. :)
     
    Mara43 and Wilderness Wanderer like this.
  12. Muha22

    Muha22 Fapstronaut

    382
    561
    93
    To me both the story and the attractiveness is important. If one of them is not good I just can't watch it
     
  13. I relate to this

    I have seen the word lust defined as desiring or enjoying sexual pleasure in a disordered or inordinate way


    When I was a teenager I could create stories in my mind (not about love, though) that preceded M. I didn't need the story to do M, it only happened and I let my imagination fly. It was like a kind of game. Over time I stopped doing so.

    I like attractive men, I've been in love, but I never have desired other person. And it's uncomfortable to think someone desires me. I think this is strange and not normal...

    I have the tendency to look at the bodies of both men and women, especially certain parts. My eyes simply go towards there, it is not necessary that they are beautiful people, but I don't desire such people nor doing anything with them. I try to avoid watching or at least try to look away as soon as possible.
    It's uncomfortable also when I see scantily clad people or people in tight clothes doing things, like acrobats, dancers, athletes... I tend to look at body parts and sometimes I tend to sexualize their movements too :emoji_see_no_evil:
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2024
    Faithe likes this.
  14. (Deleted)
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2024
  15. To dehumanize a person, to turn them into no more than a collection body parts for our own enjoyment, is certainly selfish.
     
    Faithe and Wilderness Wanderer like this.
  16. It catches my attention to see, it's curiosity I guess, bad curiosity, but I don't even enjoy it when it happens, usually this tendency to look at body parts makes me feel anxious.
    I have let myself be carried away by this only when I have watched P, but I had never realized that I was dehumanizing people! :emoji_sob:
     
    Wilderness Wanderer likes this.
  17. I cannot think overly long on just how bad I am and how dark my heart becomes when Christ is absent from it. It isn't productive to dwell on this; better by far to invite him back in and keep my focus on him. But any time I think, "I'm not *that* bad," it usually means I am ignorant (willfully or otherwise) of the truth. There is no bottom to our depravity and no cap to his goodness toward us or his ability to save us from ourselves. No one else loves the way he does.
     
  18. Muha22

    Muha22 Fapstronaut

    382
    561
    93
    The question is does it directly hurt the person ?
     
  19. The viewer is also a person, and it certainly hurts them.
     
    Mara43 and Faithe like this.
  20. Faithe

    Faithe Fapstronaut

    128
    440
    63
    Thank you for sharing. I relate a lot to this. I focus on the parts and not the looks, I guess. Maybe that narrows it down. The scenarios and fantasies just supplement it all?

    I think what Tao says about dehumanization is right. In a way, I think over-focusing on parts or at least the "benefit" of whatever scenario we imagine is also dehumanizing to ourselves. We aren't thinking of ourselves as a person either, but just a body that we happen to inhabit and "need" to satisfy. We forget "who" we are and only think about "what" we want to do with our body. Or someone else's body.

    It certainly hurts everyone involved. It's important to step back and remember that we are made in God's image. I don't want to defile what belongs to God... it's so hard to snap out of a trance when the temptation hits.

    Some odd thing I do that sometimes helps: if a perverse thought pops into my mind, I try to stop and reestablish the humanity in what I am seeing in my thoughts. If I remember something I saw in a pornographic video or image I once looked at, I will shake the thought away and remember that there is a person there. A human being made in God's image who he loves very much. They have dreams and passions and ambitions. They have fears. They have loved ones. They very likely don't want to be a porn actor/actress and were pressured into it or were desperate (the industry is very abusive like that). If you were to meet them in real life, they'd have their clothes on and be getting on their way just like you. Buying bread or visiting a friend's house or walking their dog. And I realize just how much I, and other addicts, treat them like tools or toys. And it breaks my heart because they really are just like you and me. And then I move on and dismiss it all and try not to think of that whole ordeal again. The same can apply to fictional or "cartoon" people too, since that can be an issue as well. Even these are based (loosely or otherwise) on actual people and their real personalities. For me, it is hard to continue to entertain the fantasy when I've taken notice of how weird it actually is to do to someone and to myself. So unnatural and callous. Dehumanizing, on both ends. Nausea sometimes comes over me when I think of what I'm actually doing.

    That has just worked for me recently. Rejecting those awful thoughts, but then also replacing them with the truth. Replacing them with the acknowledgement of the image of God that is there. It's no surprise that redirecting your eyes on the ways of God helps clear the muddied waters. God is continuing to help me with this.
     

Share This Page