A correlation between what? You mean whether intact or circumcised men have different experiences with PMO?
I was curious if PMO was more prevalent in circumcised men, now, obviously if more respondents are from the USA that would skew it depending on age and demographic. When I was edging and manscaping down there I couldn't stop feeling or thinking about my penis. Now I have gone all natural with pubic hair and since I have rebooting he stays very shrunk up, whereby I do not even know my penis is there. I wondered if intact males thought less about their penises and didn't feel them as much since the head was protected from rubbing against their clothes.
I think the foreskin has a lot of nerves in it which makes sex and masturbation even more pleasurable for men who have intact skins. But I don't think that would matter since it is all relative... a circumcised man has no way to realize the pleasure he's missing out on and an intact man has no way of knowing his pleasure is greater than another man's. I never really feel my penis rubbing against my clothes, even though I'm circumcised.
If you want to make a "correlation" you would need 4 options instead of two. You are only looking at 1 variable right now.
It got circumcised as an adult five years ago because I wanted it. It was the best thing I've ever done for my penis! However, I doubt that there's any correlation with fapping (since fapping is near universal) or with the tendency to become PMO-addicted.
I needed an adult circumcision at the age of 29 because after playing with myself over 20 years managed to damage my foreskin. The crazy thing is even that didn't wake me up to the damage I caused myself. I even fapped within 24 hours of surgery to check it still worked. And as a result have some scaring. I'm not sure you will get a fair corelation between cut uncut and fap nofap. There are two many variables and all the people here are trying not to fap. Where are you going to get your test sample group from? Standing in a shopping centre asking guys if they fap and if they are entire? I jest tho. It's an interesting question. As if I had the option. I would go back to entire. It's just my constant playing with myself caused phismosis.
It makes M slightly more difficult, which is a good thing. I was cut as an infant and I agree, best thing that was ever done to me. I don't like the terms "intact" or "entire", they seem like negative value judgments on a common-sense surgery that saves lives (UTIs, cancer, HIV/AIDS).
I don't like "intact", "uncut" or "entire" (although I have never heard that before). I would simply say I have a natural penis - the one I was born with. I am pleased that I didn't have part of it sliced off the end of it! As for saving lives - use a condom.
Sadly mumchance, you cannot feel your penis rubbing against your clothes because of the loss of sensitivity, because your glans penis is unprotected as intended.
As intended? Could you please show a picture of Adam so we can see what they looked like when God said "it is very good" Gen. 1:31? Jewish and Islamic tradition says he was created without a prepuce.
I cannot see how religious traditions are relevant. If you quote the bible and take that as an authority, then an unmutilated body is what God described as good.